Who visits this site? Where in the heck are they all coming from? What
kinds of stuff are they interested in? These are the questions that the
Dirty Marketing SOBs
(DMS) are just dying to know the answers to. The Dirty Marketing
SOBs are the ones who pore through server logs, analyze click-through rates,
embed subliminal messages in animated advertising bann...oops, you didn't
hear that. They are the ones with degrees in Psychology and Sociology,
the ones who are at this very moment trying to get inside your head.
They want to sell you their shit. Yes, I said shit. 99% of all ad banners,
commercial and large corporate websites, SPAM emails
(Ok, make that 100%) are just shit to most of their captive viewers. Think
about it: If you had an interest in whatever their ad is trying to sell
you, you probably would have either bought it by now or decided you weren't
ever going to. The DMS are feeling the ill effects of this fact, as click-thru
rates (percentage of people who actually click on one of those banners
versus the ones who just ignore and/or swear at it) remain abysmally low
and the DMS fail to make a highly-profitable return on their ugly little
investments. To combat this lack of profitability, the DMS have turned
to ever-more pervasive, intrusive, and downright sneaky and conniving methods
of squeezing that extra click-thru rate out of the unsuspecting and now-disgruntled
audience.
While not an immediate booster of the DMS' holy grail click-thru rate,
they can over time become a godsend to any DMS who chooses to implement
their use. Cookies are a tool used by the DMS to track your movements
through sites, where you came from, where you went, how long you stayed,
what you saw, what you clicked on. Over time, their spying allows them
to compile an detailed profile of your viewing habits, interests, preferences
(including your sexual preferences(!), what kind of products you would
prefer to buy, and even the probability that you drink/smoke/abuse drugs/have
AIDS/have cancer/buy guns... If this does not already strike you as an
absolute violation of your privacy, bear in mind that these profiles they
are building on you are by no means private or confidential. Suppose you
visit a large number of drug or alcohol sites. (Yes, they can tell where
you are surfing!) Monday you visit Anhauser-Busch's site. Tuesday you schmooze
on the Budsmoker Board, reading a marijuana-oriented discussion forum and
maybe even posting to it. Wednesday you visit Ed's 1001 Beer Joke page.
Thursday you do a Web search for vodka-related content on the Web. Friday
your insurance rates go up. It seems the DMS have sold their collected
profile of you to your insurance provider. Yep, you've been identified
as a high risk for substance abuse, and your premiums have been doubled.
These are an arguably dangerous form of online advertising in which a seperate
browser window is auto-loaded, using your browser's Javascript support,
containing some hideous ad for
some equally hideous product or service. They are possibly dangerous in
that (1) at high dosages, they suck up Windows resources until the system
becomes unstable and crashes and (2) the Javascript/new-window support
of every browser made to date has been inherently buggy; popping one up
can cause browser crashes at any time. Naturally, depending on hardware
and configuration, some viewers will be affected more severely than others.
Some have seldom, if ever, been hit with a crash from a popup window. I,
on the other hand, have experienced data loss as a result of a popup crash,
and nearly had to reinstall my operating system. Other popup problems include
slow system performance, GPFs on Windows 3.x systems, and 'bluescreen'
errors on Windows 95 machines. (Note to anyone who has not experienced
a bluescreen error, it is the same thing that results from being 'nuked'
on IRC.) When evaluating the full evil-ness of popup ads, bear in mind
their intrusiveness. Pop-up pundits argue that it is no worse than television
advertising. But I would have to disagree: With TV ads, when they come
on I normally peel myself from the couch and raid the fridge, make a sandwich,
etc. until the actual show comes back on, which happens automatically.
You do not have to push an 'End commercial' button to break out of an infinitely-looping
ad spot. Also, unlike the popup, TV ads come in contiguous blocks. Imagine
watching your favorite show and the show pauses, the sound cuts to
a loud commercial and the word PEPSI appears on a white screen for five
seconds. This happens every thirty seconds. Having fun yet? Now imagine
that after every 10 or so of these spots (or every 5 minutes) your TV's
screen freezes and it no longer responds to your remote control. So you
have to turn off the TV, count to twenty, then turn it back on and wait
for it to warm up again. Fast fact: The primary user
of the pop-up ad? Pornographic smut sites. 'Warez' pages come in a close
second. New riders of this bandwagon include Tripod
and GeoCities (Geo
popups).
Ad banners
Advertisement banners, while often gaudy and displeasing
to the eye, have always been a relatively benign form of advertising. Until
now. While ad banners are currently ubiquitous on the WWW, the low
click-thru rate has prompted ever-sneakier ways of forcing them on the
public. The most recent is a ploy in which the server actually times out
during page transfer, refusing to send the majority of the requested page
until a banner ad on it has loaded in its entirety and often gone through
5-7 seconds of animated annoyance. Only then will the actual page be displayed.
As the 'banner gestapo' have gotten steadily pushier about cramming their
ads into your eyeballs, several disgruntled 'Netizens have toyed with the
idea of playing equally dirty, writing software that can be configured
to block most ad banners. This was nearly a reality until several online
business heavyweights complained that this would bankrupt them, that is
was illegal (breaching an unwritten contract stating that surfers agree
to suffer through the banners in exchange for the content on the businesses'
website), and I believe an injunction has been issued
forbidding the sale or use of this software until the matter
can be decided upon by the courts. Don't get me wrong, there are respectable
companies such as Hotmail that provide
a useful service supported by relatively tasteful and well-managed advertising
programs. It's just that some companies have chosen to play hardball with
these ads, and an eventual backlash is inevitable.
Arguably the most disgusting, revolting, sebum-coated form of online
advertising, spamming refers to that unwanted and unsolicited 'God almighty
how on earth did this slimy (...choice words here..) get his...hands on
my...Email address anyway?' mail that may routinely rear its spammy head
in your inbox. Spammers troll for addresses submitted via online forms,
USENET postings, online directories and even your own homepage. Characteristics
include MLM or make-money-fast drivel, spams for spamming software, links
to (not-free) pornographic smut sites, and a generally 'slimy' feel when
this mail is opened. More information (indeed, possibly more than you even
know what to do with) is availible on Paul
Hsieh's ANTISPAM page, which also covers some 'software spam' such
as the popup windows mentioned above.
The DMS Survey
How tightly are the Dirty Marketing SOBs holding you?
This fun and fairly short survey is to help us to get some kind of handle
on how succesful the DMS' actions have been, and how succesful you
as a collective body of Web surfers have been at thwarting them. Please
take a few moments to fill out this simple form; all submissions will remain
anonymous and confidential, and all fields are optional. Results will be
posted below.